Re: [RFC][PATCH] new timeofday core subsystem (v.A0)

From: john stultz (johnstul_at_us.ibm.com)
Date: 09/08/04

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [patch 1/1] uml:fix ubd deadlock on SMP" 
    To: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 Sep 2004 11:07:25 -0700

    On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 17:02, George Anzinger wrote:
    > > Again, monotonic_clock() and friends are NTP adjusted, so drift caused
    > > by inaccurate calibration shouldn't be a problem the interval timer code
    > > should need to worry about (outside of maybe adjusting its interval time
    > > if its always arriving late/early). If possible the timesource
    > > calibration code should be improved, but that's icing on the cake and
    > > isn't critical.
    > >
    > Are you providing a way to predict what clock count provide a given time offset
    > INCLUDING ntp? If so, cool. If not we need to get this conversion right. We
    > will go into this more on your return.

    Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. Mind expanding on the idea while my
    brain warms back up?

    thanks
    -john

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [patch 1/1] uml:fix ubd deadlock on SMP"
    Loading