Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues
From: Ingo Molnar (mingo_at_elte.hu)
Date: 09/12/04
- Previous message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH] Yielding processor resources during lock contention"
- In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues"
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues"
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 13:20:26 +0200 To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
* William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
> Forgot to check map->page in the first spin:
>
> last_pid is not honored because next_free_map(map - 1, ...) may return
> the same map and so restart with a lesser offset.
it's getting quite spaghetti ... do we really want to handle
RESERVED_PID? There's no guarantee that any root daemon wont stray out
of the 1...300 PID range anyway, so if it has an exploitable PID race
bug then it's probably exploitable even without the RESERVED_PID
protection.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH] Yielding processor resources during lock contention"
- In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues"
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues"
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|