Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter
From: Adrian Cox (adrian_at_humboldt.co.uk)
Date: 09/22/04
- Previous message: maximilian attems: "Re: [Kernel-janitors] Re: 2.6.9-rc2-kjt1 rio_linux compile error"
- In reply to: Jean Delvare: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter"
- Next in thread: Mark M. Hoffman: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter"
- Reply: Mark M. Hoffman: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter"
- Reply: Michael Hunold: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter"
- Reply: Michael Hunold: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:32:31 +0100
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 14:38, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Aha, this is an interesting point (which was missing from your previous
> explanation). The base of your proposal would be to have several small i2c
> "trees" (where a tree is a list of adapters and a list of clients) instead of
> a larger, unique one. This would indeed solve a number of problems, and I
> admit that it is somehow equivalent to Michael's classes in that it
> efficiently prevents the hardware monitoring clients from probing the video
> stuff. The rest is just details internal to each "tree". As I understand it,
> each video device would be a tree on itself, while the whole hardware
> monitoring stuff would constitute one (bigger) tree. Correct?
I've been rereading the code, and it could be even simpler. How about
this:
1) The card driver defines an i2c_adapter structure, but never calls
i2c_add_adapter(). The only extra thing it needs to do is to initialise
the semaphores in the structure.
2) The frontend calls i2c_transfer() directly.
3) The i2c core never gets involved, and there is never any i2c_client
structure.
This gives us the required reuse of the I2C algo-bit code, without any
of the list walking or device probing being required.
- Adrian Cox
Humboldt Solutions Ltd.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: maximilian attems: "Re: [Kernel-janitors] Re: 2.6.9-rc2-kjt1 rio_linux compile error"
- In reply to: Jean Delvare: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter"
- Next in thread: Mark M. Hoffman: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter"
- Reply: Mark M. Hoffman: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter"
- Reply: Michael Hunold: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter"
- Reply: Michael Hunold: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|