Re: 1GB/2GB/3GB User Space Splitting Patch 2.6.8.1 (PSEUDO SPAM)
From: Timothy Miller (miller_at_techsource.com)
Date: 09/22/04
- Previous message: Pozsar Balazs: "Re: SCSI Initio 9100UW (INIC-950p chipset) support nunder kernel 2.6.x"
- In reply to: Roland Dreier: "Re: 1GB/2GB/3GB User Space Splitting Patch 2.6.8.1 (PSEUDO SPAM)"
- Next in thread: Roland Dreier: "Re: 1GB/2GB/3GB User Space Splitting Patch 2.6.8.1 (PSEUDO SPAM)"
- Reply: Roland Dreier: "Re: 1GB/2GB/3GB User Space Splitting Patch 2.6.8.1 (PSEUDO SPAM)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:22:55 -0400 To: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
Roland Dreier wrote:
> Timothy> My question is: Why can't we just shrink the kernel
> Timothy> address space by that same amount, allowing the kernel
> Timothy> address space plus the extra to fit into 1GB?
>
> If you have 1 GB of memory and want to map it all into the kernel's
> address space and the kernel has only 1 GB of address space total,
> then there is no room for anything else (such as address space to
> ioremap memory-mapped peripherals or space for vmalloc allocations).
> Therefore, if you want to have 1 GB of RAM mapped linearly into the
> kernel's address space, you need strictly more than 1 GB of kernel
> address space. In practice, 1.25 GB of kernel address space (a
> PAGE_OFFSET value of 0xb0000000) works well with 1 GB of RAM. That's
> what I run on my main desktop machine with 1 GB of RAM to avoid HIGHMEM.
>
> - Roland
>
>
Ok, I understand now. I think. With 0xc0000000, you have 128M of
highmem, right? Why do you add 256M to the kernel address space? Is
there a further advantage to that?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Pozsar Balazs: "Re: SCSI Initio 9100UW (INIC-950p chipset) support nunder kernel 2.6.x"
- In reply to: Roland Dreier: "Re: 1GB/2GB/3GB User Space Splitting Patch 2.6.8.1 (PSEUDO SPAM)"
- Next in thread: Roland Dreier: "Re: 1GB/2GB/3GB User Space Splitting Patch 2.6.8.1 (PSEUDO SPAM)"
- Reply: Roland Dreier: "Re: 1GB/2GB/3GB User Space Splitting Patch 2.6.8.1 (PSEUDO SPAM)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|