Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues
From: Pavel Machek (pavel_at_suse.cz)
Date: 09/23/04
- Previous message: Jan Beulich: "i386 entry.S problems"
- In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:11:33 +0200 To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>, linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cw@f00f.org, mingo@elte.hu, anton@samba.org
Hi!
> > 1. weak security enhancement
> > 2. cosmetic (backwards, IMHO)
> > 3. speed (avoid PIDs likely to be used)
>
> Well, weak security enhancement translates to "nop" in my book, but
> I guess if that's really what people were trying to arrange...
>
Well, how many times did you do kill <pid> from command line after doing ps?
If you randomly kill some other process because pids wrapped too fast, it is bad.
-- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jan Beulich: "i386 entry.S problems"
- In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues"
- Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|