Re: IDE Hotswap

From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 09/29/04

  • Next message: Paul Fulghum: "RE: 2.6.9-rc2-mm4 e100 enable_irq unbalanced from"
    To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>
    Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 2004 02:50:34 +0100
    
    

    On Mer, 2004-09-29 at 02:54, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
    > Your patch is a nice start but it don't solve main issues, not to even
    > mention minor stuff like leaving /proc/ide/<chipset> around.
    > Merging it now is asking for problems.

    Oh I agree. There is a patch but it isn't the final answer. There is a
    small resource bug (harmless but a bug) in the 2.6.8.1-ac patch. I
    hadn't noticed proc/ide/<chipset> leaking but I'll take a look when I
    get time to sort that out.

    > > For drive level hotplug its actually a lot easier and I guess that is
    > > the case most users care about. The changes done for 2.6 clean up stuff
    >
    > drive level hotplug is actually much harder
    > and it is _required_ for controller level hotplug, no? :)

    Actually its all a lot easier now than in 2.4 because the block layer is
    designed to make it possible.

    > > like suspend mean the nasties in 2.4 for sequencing have gone away. No
    > > refcounting needed since the block and fs layer are doing it all for
    >
    > It helps but you still get bunch of races. Refcounting is _really_ needed.

    Even in 2.4 ide drive hotplug was easy. The drive hotplug comes out
    trivially because your controllers are fairly constant. As we all know
    driver level hotplug is a bit trickier although the block layer has
    really made this vastly easier in 2.6

    For drive level hotplug you don't actually need refcounting at all
    providing you've got a couple of locking issues dealt with.

    Firstly the drive never goes away as a high level object (in fact you
    don't want it to as then you can't ioctl it to make it come back!). That
    means the upper layers don't know anything about it.

    At the IDE layer the 2.4 code simply enforced the rule that you must be
    the only opener of the device in order to hot unplug it. That means we
    know its quiescent and not mounted. The only 2.4 race I know about is
    suspend in parallel to hot unplug, and 2.6 has the mechanism to fix that
    properly because suspend is a command state machine.

    Providing hot unplug is about making drive->present stuff vary and
    flipping to ide_default drivers the world is happy. The moment you want
    to make /dev/hda 'disappear' to the block layer its fun, and on 2.4 its
    as good as impossible.

    Alan

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Paul Fulghum: "RE: 2.6.9-rc2-mm4 e100 enable_irq unbalanced from"

    Relevant Pages