Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 09/29/04
- Previous message: newhopeint: "Happy days are here again"
- In reply to: Felix Kühling: "Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!"
- Next in thread: Jon Smirl: "Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Discuss issues related to the xorg tree <xorg@freedesktop.org> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:02:57 +0100
On Mer, 2004-09-29 at 22:52, Felix Kühling wrote:
> Module Size Used by
> savage 3520 0
> drm 62500 3 savage
>
> Is it normal that the savage module looks unused?
looks like a bug. If the drm layer provides the file_operations for
the device node then the locking done automatically locks the wrong
module. Thats easy to fix with try_module_get() and module_put()
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: newhopeint: "Happy days are here again"
- In reply to: Felix Kühling: "Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!"
- Next in thread: Jon Smirl: "Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]