Re: LVM Oops
From: Chris Wedgwood (cw_at_f00f.org)
Date: 10/31/04
- Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4]"
- In reply to: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Next in thread: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Reply: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:21:33 -0700 To: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-news2004-05@lina.inka.de>
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 02:35:57AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Was the snapshot volumne full? I once had oopses in that situation
> (with XFS).
Which version of XFS and when? The XFS block allocator uses more
stack in low-memory conditions and would over-flow 4K stacks
previously but Nathan made some changes which should make it better.
--cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Lee Revell: "Re: [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4]"
- In reply to: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Next in thread: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Reply: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|