Re: LVM Oops
From: Bernd Eckenfels (be-mail2004_at_lina.inka.de)
Date: 10/31/04
- Previous message: Dave Airlie: "Re: [2.6 patch] DRM: remove unused functions"
- In reply to: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Next in thread: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Reply: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:13:55 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 07:21:33PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> Which version of XFS and when? The XFS block allocator uses more
> stack in low-memory conditions and would over-flow 4K stacks
> previously but Nathan made some changes which should make it better.
It was some 2.4 version, but the stacktrace was not related to XFS I think.
It was just that reproducible one got panic or oops (not sure) if the
snapshot volumne was full. Hevent tried that with 2.6 yet, will do.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- Bernd_Eckenfels@Mörscher_Strasse_8.76185Karlsruhe.de --
( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://www.eckes.org/
o--o 1024D/E383CD7E eckes@IRCNet v:+497211603874 f:+497211606754
(O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Dave Airlie: "Re: [2.6 patch] DRM: remove unused functions"
- In reply to: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Next in thread: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Reply: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: LVM Oops"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
