Re: [OT] Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 10/31/04
- Previous message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: unit-at-a-time..."
- In reply to: Ken Moffat: "Re: [OT] Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [OT] Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Ken Moffat <ken@kenmoffat.uklinux.net> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:44:11 +0000
On Sul, 2004-10-31 at 01:09, Ken Moffat wrote:
> and the time to load it is irrelevant. Since then I've had an anecdotal
> report that -Os is known to cause problems with gnome. I s'pose people
> will say it serves me right for doing my initial testing on ppc which
> didn't have this problem ;) The point is that -Os is *much* less tested
> than -O2 at the moment.
I've seen no real problems - x86-32 or x86-64, and my gnumeric appears
happy. Could be that the Red Hat gcc 3.3 has the relevant fixes already
in it from upstream I guess.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Mikael Pettersson: "Re: unit-at-a-time..."
- In reply to: Ken Moffat: "Re: [OT] Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]"
- Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [OT] Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|