Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]
From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 10/31/04
- Previous message: Jan Engelhardt: "Pipe sizes"
- In reply to: Z Smith: "Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]"
- Next in thread: Z Smith: "Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]"
- Reply: Z Smith: "Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Z Smith <plinius@comcast.net> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 15:19:50 +0000
On Sul, 2004-10-31 at 01:21, Z Smith wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > So if the desktop stuff is annoying you join gnome-love or whatever the
> > kde equivalent is 8)
>
> Or join me in my effort to limit bloat. Why use an X server
> that uses 15-30 megs of RAM when you can use FBUI which is 25 kilobytes
> of code with very minimal kmallocing?
My X server seems to be running at about 4Mbytes, plus the frame buffer
mappings which make it appear a lot larger. I wouldn't be suprised if
half the 4Mb was pixmap cache too, maybe more.
I've helped write tiny UI kits (take a look at nanogui for example) but
they don't have the flexibility of X.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jan Engelhardt: "Pipe sizes"
- In reply to: Z Smith: "Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]"
- Next in thread: Z Smith: "Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]"
- Reply: Z Smith: "Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|