'C' calling convention change.
From: Richard B. Johnson (root_at_chaos.analogic.com)
Date: 10/06/04
- Previous message: Hideo AOKI: "Re: [PATCH 2.6] vm-thrashing-control-tuning"
- Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: 'C' calling convention change."
- Reply: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: 'C' calling convention change."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 08:20:16 -0400 (EDT) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
The new Red Hat Fedora release uses the following gcc version:
gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 20040412 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.3-7)
I have many assembly-language routines that need to interface with
'C' code. The new 'C' compiler is doing something different than
gcc 3.2, previously used.
I need to know what general-purpose registers need to be saved
in the called procedure. Previously, one needed to save the
index registers only (%ebx, %edi, %esi). Apparently I need to
save others with the new compiler because, although the called
procedures work, subsequent 'C' code fails in strange ways.
Please, if somebody __knows__ (really knows), let me know. I
will have to edit over 200 assembly-language files and I want
to do it only once! I don't want to just save all the registers
used because this wastes CPU cycles and the only reason for
the assembly in the first place was to save CPU cycles.
Cheers,
*** Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.5-1.358-noreg on an i686 machine (5570.56 BogoMips).
Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Hideo AOKI: "Re: [PATCH 2.6] vm-thrashing-control-tuning"
- Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: 'C' calling convention change."
- Reply: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: 'C' calling convention change."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]