Re: 'C' calling convention change.
From: Arjan van de Ven (arjanv_at_redhat.com)
Date: 10/06/04
- Previous message: Jeff Moyer: "Re: [patch rfc] towards supporting O_NONBLOCK on regular files"
- In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "'C' calling convention change."
- Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: 'C' calling convention change."
- Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: 'C' calling convention change."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:16:50 +0200
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 14:20, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> The new Red Hat Fedora release uses the following gcc version:
>
> gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 20040412 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.3-7)
>
> I have many assembly-language routines that need to interface with
> 'C' code. The new 'C' compiler is doing something different than
> gcc 3.2, previously used.
I assume you're talking about userspace code here. Why are you bringing
that up on the kernel list?
The gcc list or even a fedora(-devel) list would be far more
appropriate.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Jeff Moyer: "Re: [patch rfc] towards supporting O_NONBLOCK on regular files"
- In reply to: Richard B. Johnson: "'C' calling convention change."
- Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: 'C' calling convention change."
- Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: 'C' calling convention change."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
