Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)
From: Chuck Ebbert (76306.1226_at_compuserve.com)
Date: 10/07/04
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc3-mm2] EDD: use EXTENDED READ command, add CONFIG_EDD_SKIP_MBR"
- Next in thread: Trent Lloyd: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Reply: Trent Lloyd: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Reply: alan: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Maybe reply: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Maybe reply: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Maybe reply: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Maybe reply: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 01:31:39 -0400 To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Why has linux 2.6.8 been abandoned at version 2.6.8.1?
There exist fixes that could go into 2.6.8.2:
process start time doesn't match system time
FDDI frame doesn't allow 802.3 hwtype
NFS server using XFS filesystem on SMP machine oopses
I'm sure there are more...
So why is 2.6.8.1 a "dead branch?"
--Chuck Ebbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc3-mm2] EDD: use EXTENDED READ command, add CONFIG_EDD_SKIP_MBR"
- Next in thread: Trent Lloyd: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Reply: Trent Lloyd: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Reply: alan: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Maybe reply: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Maybe reply: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Maybe reply: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Maybe reply: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: Why no linux-2.6.8.2? (was Re: new dev model)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|