Re: Maximum block dev size / filesystem size

From: Alan Cox (alan_at_lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: 10/07/04

  • Next message: Andrew Vasquez: "Re: 2.6.9-rc3-mm3: `risc_code_addr01' multiple definition"
    To: aaron@alpete.com
    Date:	Thu, 07 Oct 2004 20:39:24 +0100
    
    

    On Iau, 2004-10-07 at 21:19, Aaron Peterson wrote:
    > I work for a company with a 15 TB SAN. All opinions about the
    > disadvantages of creating really large filesystems aside, I'm trying to
    > find out what is the maximum filesystem size we can allocate on our SAN
    > that a linux box (x86) can really use.

    For 2.4.x 1Tb (2Tb works for some devices but its a bit variable)

    > What I can't seem to find anywhere is whether the 2 TB block device
    > limit has improved/grown with 2.6 kernels (on x86 hardware). Perhaps
    > I've looked in the wrong places, but I haven't found anything.

    2.6 fixed this problem although it appears not for some specialist
    cases. Last time I checked LVM logical volumes over 2Tb were reported
    problematic.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Andrew Vasquez: "Re: 2.6.9-rc3-mm3: `risc_code_addr01' multiple definition"

    Relevant Pages

    • FreeBSD 6.x and disklabel
      ... we've been looking at purchasing a SAN here and I came across this ... turn affected the maximum filesystem size. ... Reuben A. Popp ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
      ... There was a bug in the SAN firmware that caused the ... Filesystem size in blocks: 1855561728 ... Emulex card. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
      ... There was a bug in the SAN firmware that caused the ... > correct info. Does anyone know what may be causing the problem or how ... you should be able to mount it read-only ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [Jfs-discussion] fsck.jfs segfaults on x86_64
      ... On 6/10/05, Dave Kleikamp wrote: ... There was a bug in the SAN firmware that caused the ... >> correct info. Does anyone know what may be causing the problem or how ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: new qla2xxx driver breaks SAN setup with 2 controllers
      ... >> Actually this sounds like a bug in your storage system. ... > Unfortunately this does not fix this issue, besides the SAN being ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)