Re: kswapd in tight loop 2.6.9-rc3-bk-recent
From: Nick Piggin (piggin_at_cyberone.com.au)
Date: 10/08/04
- Previous message: Ray Bryant: "[PATCH 1/1] lockmeter: lockmeter-lockmeter-fix-for-generic_read_trylock.patch"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: kswapd in tight loop 2.6.9-rc3-bk-recent"
- Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: kswapd in tight loop 2.6.9-rc3-bk-recent"
- Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: kswapd in tight loop 2.6.9-rc3-bk-recent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:13:16 +1000 To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
>Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
>
>>>Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> wrote:
>>>
>> >
>> >>(whereas I could get the mainline code, and the
>> >> one-liner to spin right off).
>> >>
>> >
>> >How? (up to and including .config please).
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Ah, free_pages <= pages_high, ie. 0 <= 0, which is true;
>> commence spinning.
>>
>
>Maybe. It requires that the zonelists be screwy:
>
> Node 1 DMA free:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB
> protections[]: 0 0 0
> Node 1 Normal free:25272kB min:1020kB low:2040kB high:3060kB active:624172kB inactive:282700kB present:1047936kB
> protections[]: 0 0 0
> Node 1 HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:256kB high:384kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB
> protections[]: 0 0 0
> Node 0 DMA free:728kB min:12kB low:24kB high:36kB active:788kB inactive:7848kB present:16384kB
> protections[]: 0 0 0
> Node 0 Normal free:27200kB min:1004kB low:2008kB high:3012kB active:332792kB inactive:422744kB present:1032188kB
> protections[]: 0 0 0
> Node 0 HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:256kB high:384kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB
> protections[]: 0 0 0
>
>See that DMA zone on node 1? Wonder how it got like that. It
>should not be inside pgdat->nrzones anyway.
>
>
Oh? Why not? I didn't think empty zones were filtered out? (perhaps
they should be).
>David, is your setup NUMA? Can you show us a sysrq-M dump?
>
>
Yes. Incase he's alseep, I'll quote:
"I saw the same thing yesterday, also on an amd64 box though that
could be coincidence. The kswapd1 process was pegging the cpu at 99%
kswapd0 was idle. After a few minutes, the box became so unresponsive"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Ray Bryant: "[PATCH 1/1] lockmeter: lockmeter-lockmeter-fix-for-generic_read_trylock.patch"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: kswapd in tight loop 2.6.9-rc3-bk-recent"
- Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: kswapd in tight loop 2.6.9-rc3-bk-recent"
- Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: kswapd in tight loop 2.6.9-rc3-bk-recent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|