Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U0
From: Roland Dreier (roland_at_topspin.com)
Date: 10/15/04
- Previous message: Adam Heath: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U2"
- In reply to: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U0"
- Next in thread: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U0"
- Reply: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U0"
- Reply: Robert Wisniewski: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: karim@opersys.com Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:31:19 -0700
Karim> cmpxchg (basically: try reserve; if fail retry; else
Karim> write), with per-cpu buffers.
Not sure if I really understand the context where Ingo would use this,
but this lockless scheme doesn't seem to be safe for realtime; the
retry can potentially happen an arbitrary number of times.
- Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Adam Heath: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U2"
- In reply to: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U0"
- Next in thread: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U0"
- Reply: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U0"
- Reply: Robert Wisniewski: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -VP-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|