Re: [PATCH 0/8] replacing/fixing printk with pr_debug/pr_info in arch/i386 - intro

From: Joe Perches (joe_at_perches.com)
Date: 10/17/04

  • Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH 0/8] replacing/fixing printk with pr_debug/pr_info in arch/i386 - intro" 
    To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:	Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:23:42 -0700

    On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 20:10 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
    > Iff you ever want to replace the above, make sure to do it like this:
    > printk_info("Start... ");
    > ...
    > printkc_info("Ok!\n");
    >
    > (with `printkc_info()' being a continuation of `printk_info()'. And do the same
    > for all other KERN_* variations. This would add real value, since the next step
    > is to make the printk{,c}_*() definitions conditionally empty for embedded
    > systems and/or systems with few memory.
    >
    > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

    I suggest this is the incorrect usage.
    Start then Continue then End.
    I suppose one could use Continue/End with an implied start
    or simply End (ie: printk)

    cheers, joe
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH 0/8] replacing/fixing printk with pr_debug/pr_info in arch/i386 - intro"

    Relevant Pages