Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U6
From: Lee Revell (rlrevell_at_joe-job.com)
Date: 10/19/04
- Previous message: Jerome Borsboom: "Re: process start time set wrongly at boot for kernel 2.6.9"
- In reply to: Adam Heath: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U6"
- Next in thread: Florian Schmidt: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U6"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:59:34 -0400
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 14:52, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I am still having the same bug(repeatable by running liquidwar) as I
> > > reported with -U5(see my earlier email).
> >
> > ok, this seems to be some questionable code in OSS. It really has no
> > business up()-ing the inode semaphore - nobody down()-ed it before! This
> > could be either a bad workaround for a bug/hang someone saw, or an old
> > VFS assumption that doesnt hold anymore. In any case, could you try the
> > patch below, does it fix liquidwar?
>
> Yup, the below fixes it. However, this problem *only* started occuring in
> -U5. I've been running liquidwar on all versions(it's my current
> game-to-play-when-I-feel-stupid program).
The real fix is to use ALSA. :-)
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jerome Borsboom: "Re: process start time set wrongly at boot for kernel 2.6.9"
- In reply to: Adam Heath: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U6"
- Next in thread: Florian Schmidt: "Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U6"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
