Re: The naming wars continue...
From: Chuck Ebbert (76306.1226_at_compuserve.com)
Date: 10/23/04
- Previous message: markus reichelt: "Re: The naming wars continue..."
- Maybe in reply to: Linus Torvalds: "The naming wars continue..."
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: The naming wars continue..."
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: The naming wars continue..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:17:52 -0400 To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 at 18:15:49 -0700 William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> I'm sure you have a well-founded logically consistent self-consistent
> method of defining what release candidates are; unfortunately hordes of
> others do, too, and their notions are in turn all subtly inconsistent
> with yours and each other's, and they're all relatively vocal about them.
Others are arguing about _subtle_ differences; what Linus did was huge
by comparison. It's as if they were discussing what shade of red to call
something and Linus came along and declared it green!
"Release candidate" means candidate for release. Simple and easy to
understand, no? Does Linus plan on possibly releaseing -rc1 as 2.6.10
tomorrow? I don't think so...
I plan to start testing 2.6.10 upon its final release.
--Chuck Ebbert 23-Oct-04 09:18:15
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: markus reichelt: "Re: The naming wars continue..."
- Maybe in reply to: Linus Torvalds: "The naming wars continue..."
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: The naming wars continue..."
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: The naming wars continue..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]