generic hardirq code in 2.6.10-rc1
From: Christoph Hellwig (hch_at_infradead.org)
Date: 10/24/04
- Previous message: Hugh Dickins: "[PATCH] shmem NUMA policy spinlock"
- In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "The naming wars continue..."
- Next in thread: Miles Bader: "Re: generic hardirq code in 2.6.10-rc1"
- Reply: Miles Bader: "Re: generic hardirq code in 2.6.10-rc1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:54:43 +0100 To: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
> o generic irq subsystem: core
> o generic irq subsystem: x86 port
> o generic irq subsystem: x86_64 port
> o generic irq subsystem: ppc port
> o generic irq subsystem: ppc64 port
Btw, it would be nice if all architectures that have more or less
a copy of the i386 irq.c could switch to the generic code.
That would be: alpha,ia64, m32r, mips, sh, sh64, um, v850
and possibly cris (it currently has a simplified version)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Hugh Dickins: "[PATCH] shmem NUMA policy spinlock"
- In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "The naming wars continue..."
- Next in thread: Miles Bader: "Re: generic hardirq code in 2.6.10-rc1"
- Reply: Miles Bader: "Re: generic hardirq code in 2.6.10-rc1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]