RE: Buggy DSDTs policy ?
From: Yu, Luming (luming.yu_at_intel.com)
Date: 10/25/04
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 2.6.10-rc1 & ahci & IHC6R & 925X & raid1"
- Maybe in reply to: Olivier Galibert: "Buggy DSDTs policy ?"
- Next in thread: Pekka Pietikainen: "Re: Buggy DSDTs policy ?"
- Reply: Pekka Pietikainen: "Re: Buggy DSDTs policy ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:21:09 +0800 To: "Pekka Pietikainen" <pp@ee.oulu.fi>, "Xavier Bestel" <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
>> Yes, sure. But real non-technical people won't replace their DSDT
>> either.
>Their distro could do it for them :-) A simple approach would be to
>store md5sums of known-bad dsdt's and xdeltas to fixed ones, and the
>fixed one gets placed in /etc where mkinitrd automagically picks it up
>whenever a new kernel is installed.
I don't think distro can do that, because they are not the owner of
DSDT.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 2.6.10-rc1 & ahci & IHC6R & 925X & raid1"
- Maybe in reply to: Olivier Galibert: "Buggy DSDTs policy ?"
- Next in thread: Pekka Pietikainen: "Re: Buggy DSDTs policy ?"
- Reply: Pekka Pietikainen: "Re: Buggy DSDTs policy ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]