Re: Hugepages demand paging V1 [4/4]: Numa patch

From: William Lee Irwin III (wli_at_holomorphy.com)
Date: 10/25/04

  • Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model"" 
    Date:	Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:55:52 -0700
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>

    On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 02:25:09PM -0700, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
    >> The allocate from next best node is orthogonal to hugetlb demand paging.
    >> This should be merged once all the bugs are fixed and later when demand
    >> paging goes in, we can add the mpol_* stuff.

    On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 02:52:19PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    > I'm not too picky about this. It appears to be the 4th of the series,
    > so assuming they go in in order that should meet your expectations. I
    > am significantly more concerned about the flush_dcache_page() issue in
    > general, though. I guess this should light a fire under my backside to
    > dredge up the docs describing the proper TLB flushing methods to use
    > in conjunction with large page extensions for the affected arches.

    Cache flushing methods.

    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""

    Relevant Pages