Re: Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt (benh_at_kernel.crashing.org)
Date: 10/27/04
- Previous message: Mirko Bonasorte: "(no subject)"
- In reply to: Tim Schmielau: "Re: Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep"
- Next in thread: Tim Schmielau: "Re: Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep"
- Reply: Tim Schmielau: "Re: Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep"
- Reply: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 22:06:29 +1000
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 13:20 +0200, Tim Schmielau wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Not much datas at this point yet, but paulus and I noticed that current
> > bk (happened already last saturday or so) has a very strange problem
> > when waking up from sleep (suspend to ram) on our laptops.
>
> It's a shot in the dark, but I am concerned whether timers continue to
> work correctly after suspend with the following patch from Linus' bk tree.
> I think jiffies may not be set behind the back of the timer subsystem, but
> maybe it works if we can guarantee there are no timers scheduled.
>
> It might be worth backing out and retesting.
The problem has been observed on ppc, while this patch only affects
i386...
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Mirko Bonasorte: "(no subject)"
- In reply to: Tim Schmielau: "Re: Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep"
- Next in thread: Tim Schmielau: "Re: Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep"
- Reply: Tim Schmielau: "Re: Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep"
- Reply: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: Strange IO behaviour on wakeup from sleep"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]