Re: My thoughts on the "new development model"
From: William Lee Irwin III (wli_at_holomorphy.com)
Date: 10/28/04
- Previous message: james4765_at_verizon.net: "[PATCH 6/9] to arch/sparc/Kconfig"
- In reply to: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""
- Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""
- Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:03:29 -0700 To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 at 00:13:44 -0700 William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> I'd expect vastly less than 1%, starting from the arch count, and then
>> making some conservative guesses about drivers. Drivers probably
>> actually take it down to far, far less than 1%.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:04:41AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Sure, but pretty much each installation uses a different 1%.
> If there's a bug in there it's bound to hit someone; that's
> what makes OS writing so difficult. (And that's why "It works
> for me" is not really a useful statement about the overall quality
> of an operating system.)
99.99% of users use one arch, i386.
99.99% of users use one disk driver, IDE.
The intersection of these users is probably well over 99.999% of all
users.
Then probably a small list of secondary drivers varies. Statistically,
users with anything but the crappiest x86 s**tboxen and a tiny subset
of all drivers (arjan's 20) are hopelessly outnumbered.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: james4765_at_verizon.net: "[PATCH 6/9] to arch/sparc/Kconfig"
- In reply to: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""
- Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""
- Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""
- Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""
- Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: My thoughts on the "new development model""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|