Re: The naming wars continue...
From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_stusta.de)
Date: 10/29/04
- Previous message: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: ERROR: Disabling IRQ #11"
- Maybe in reply to: Linus Torvalds: "The naming wars continue..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:11:10 +0200 To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > Read-only /usr is required according to the FHS, and at least on Debian
> > a read-only /usr works without problems.
>
> Indeed. And that's what I use. In /etc/apt/apt.conf I have:
>
> DPkg {
> // Auto re-mounting of a readonly /usr
> Pre-Invoke {"mount -o remount,rw /usr";};
> Post-Invoke {"mount -o remount,ro /usr";};
> }
>
> > A bigger problem might be to properly support it in the package manager.
>
> Yep. Apt knows about it, but dpkg doesn't. And remounting /usr read-only
> fails if files are in use.
I was more thinking about the problems like a database upgrade requiring
changes to e.g. the system tables of the database handled in the
{pre,post}inst scripts. It even becomes more tricky since a postinst
script might make changes to both /usr and such required actions.
These issues which require auditing of all packages are the real issue.
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Maciej W. Rozycki: "Re: ERROR: Disabling IRQ #11"
- Maybe in reply to: Linus Torvalds: "The naming wars continue..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|