Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [2.6 patch] usbnet.c: remove an unused function
From: David Brownell (david-b_at_pacbell.net)
Date: 10/30/04
- Previous message: Kay Sievers: "Re: [Patch] 2.6.10.rc1.bk6 /lib/kobject_uevent.c buffer issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:37:04 -0700
On Friday 29 October 2004 16:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:17:30PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > p.s. Last I looked, GCC ignored unused inlines; no code
> > generated, no warnings. Did that change?
> >...
>
> It didn't change.
>
> But there are three different possible reactions on my patches:
> 1. ACK, kill this dead code
> 2. ups, I really wanted to use this function
> 3. please keep, code using this function will/might follow in the future
>
> Case 1 is the most common case (and this simply removes some dead code).
>
> I had until now two times case 2 (which means the code is now better).
>
> You are the first person for case 3.
And presumably there will also be at least a few case 4:
4. no response, treated as an ACK.
:)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Kay Sievers: "Re: [Patch] 2.6.10.rc1.bk6 /lib/kobject_uevent.c buffer issues"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
