kconfig/build question..
From: Dave Airlie (airlied_at_linux.ie)
Date: 11/10/04
- Previous message: Marcel Holtmann: "Re: [PATCH] remove explicit k_name use in atmel_cs.c, bt3c_cs.c"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: kconfig/build question.."
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: kconfig/build question.."
- Reply: Roman Zippel: "Re: kconfig/build question.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:16:10 +0000 (GMT) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
I've come across something that I'm not sure Kconfig can do but I'll
explain what I need and see what others can come up with...
The DRM has a weak dependency on AGP, it does not require AGP for all
situations but can use it in most...
So what I want to do and what I think Kbuild can't do is:
if CONFIG_AGP=n then CONFIG_DRM can be n,m,y
if CONFIG_AGP=m then CONFIG_DRM can be m but not y
if CONFIG_AGP=y then CONFIG_DRM can be m,y
This also needs to work for oldconfigs if it can be enforced, so someone
who has a valid config now of CONFIG_AGP=m, CONFIG_DRM=y will be
questioned...
I'm thinking I could change the name of CONFIG_DRM to CONFIG_DRM_CORE and
just use the default rules, if the worst comes to the worst...
Dave.
-- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Marcel Holtmann: "Re: [PATCH] remove explicit k_name use in atmel_cs.c, bt3c_cs.c"
- Next in thread: Adrian Bunk: "Re: kconfig/build question.."
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: kconfig/build question.."
- Reply: Roman Zippel: "Re: kconfig/build question.."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
