Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET
From: Chris Wright (chrisw_at_osdl.org)
Date: 11/18/04
- Previous message: Jan Engelhardt: "Re: [patch 2.6.10-rc2] oss: AC97 quirk facility"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET"
- Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:34:11 -0800 To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
* Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk) wrote:
> On Iau, 2004-11-18 at 03:42, James Morris wrote:
> > > Well, my reading of socket(2) suggests that it's _not_ supposed to work.
> >
> > sendto() on a non connected socket should fail with ENOTCONN.
>
> Not entirely true at all. A network protocol can implement lazy binding
> and
> do implicit binding on the sendto. Other protocols might not actually
> have
> a receiving component so have no bind() functionality at all.
Just to be clear, this fix is not at socket layer, but specific to UNIX
domain socket protocol layer.
thanks,
-chris
-- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jan Engelhardt: "Re: [patch 2.6.10-rc2] oss: AC97 quirk facility"
- In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET"
- Next in thread: James Morris: "Re: [PATCH] linux 2.9.10-rc1: Fix oops in unix_dgram_sendmsg when using SELinux and SOCK_SEQPACKET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|