(no subject)

From: Haines Brown (brownh_at_hartford-hwp.com)
Date: 12/04/04

  • Next message: Andrew Benton: "reiser4 crash"
    To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    Date:	Sat,  4 Dec 2004 06:37:50 -0500 (EST)
    
    

    On a new installation Debian sarge, I had this as my working
    bootloader stanza:

      title Debian sarge 2.6.8-1-386
        root (hd2,0)
        kernel /vmlinuz ro root=/dev/sdc1 apm=off
        initrd /initrd.img

      (pointing to symlink initrd.img@ -> /boot/initrd.img-2.6.8-1-386)

    This worked fine until I did an automatic upgrade of all my installed
    packages, which seems to have included an upgrade of initrd.img. This
    upgrade of packages came with an alert that my bootloader requires
    that I add initrd=/initrd.img to the images=/vmlinuz stanza.

    I found that the upgrade replaced my
    "/boot/initrd.img-2.6.8-1-386" file with a file named
    "/boot/initrd.img-2.6.8-1-386.new". Is this a
    legitimate name?

    More importantly, this new file has zero-length and so naturally
    results in a kernel panic:

      Cannot open root device 'sdc1' or unknown-block(0,0)
      Please append a correct "root=" boot option
      Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)

    Does it look like the new initrd.img package for 2.6.8 is broken or
    simply a flawed installation? Should initrd.img-1-386 file not have
    ended with ".new"? What should I do to correct this situation?

    Haines Brown

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Andrew Benton: "reiser4 crash"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Purchase XP, where and which version?
      ... previous Windows installation (onto a newly formatted hard drive in this ... are not stand alone Windows 98 install disks AFSIK.) ... Then run the XP upgrade CD ... then there may be little downside to a clean installation for you. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: How to Repair Office Installation w/o Program Launch?
      ... If your current product is an upgrade version you ... are REQUIRED to retain the qualifying product as a part of your upgrade ... The only way to complete the installation ... I need to detect and repair my Office ...
      (microsoft.public.office.setup)
    • Re: need to upgrade from Office 2001 for Mac
      ... need to upgrade from Office 2001 for Mac ... disk drive and the installer will usually recognise it and just work. ... I'm guessing that the installation files on the floppies are all ...
      (microsoft.public.mac.office)
    • Re: upgrade to Windows XP professional
      ... First the problem The install makes it through the "collecting information" and Dynamic Upgrade" sections. ... If you turn off all of WinXP GUI eye-candy, it will still be very slow, but it might be usable for simple word processing, email, web-browsing, etc. ... But I'm not sure how easy that would be to do with an upgrade CD rather than a new installation CD. ... This information will be found at the PC's manufacturer's web site, and on Microsoft's Windows Catalog: ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
    • Re: Upgrading to XP w/SP2 from 98SE, via boot of CD
      ... They, or equivalent XP versions, can be reinstalled once the upgrade is ... If you've decided to bite the bullet and go with a clean installation of XP, ... To let you know more of what I use on my comp, and do, I figured I'd give you ... off everything, including the antivirus program, while upgrading. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)