Re: [2.6.9+] PnPBIOS: Missing SMALL_TAG_ENDDEP tag

From: Adam Belay (ambx1_at_neo.rr.com)
Date: 12/07/04

  • Next message: Con Kolivas: "Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets" 
    Date:	Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:03:19 -0500
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>

    On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:04:29PM +0100, Rene Herman wrote:
    > Adam Belay wrote:
    >
    > >I appreciate the additional information. I looked through the binary files
    > >manually and confirmed that they are missing an end-dep tag. It should be
    > >harmless however. I think the error message needs to be debug or it could
    > >be removed.
    >
    > As far as I'm concerned, making it debug is not too useful. I normally
    > have pnp debug enabled but not to debug my BIOS.
    >
    > Hence attachment. Could you push it on yourself if you agree? Thanks...
    >
    > Rene.
    >
    >

    Even if there is a problematic usage of dep tags, the possible resource list
    will reflect it, so I'm fine with removing the message. Thanks for the patch.

    Adam

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Con Kolivas: "Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets"

    Relevant Pages