Re: ipv6 getting more and more broken

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik_at_pobox.com)
Date: 12/09/04

  • Next message: Adam J. Richter: "[patch?] unpin sysfs directories, saving ~0.5MB" 
    Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2004 02:19:21 -0500
To: felix-linuxkernel@fefe.de

    On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 03:46:49AM +0100, felix-linuxkernel@fefe.de wrote:
    > In 2.6.9, the machines don't even get a link-local address when bringing
    > an interface up! This is so utterly and completely broken, how can it
    > be that nobody has noticed this yet? I have compiled in ipv6
    > statically, not as a module, but that should not matter, right?

    I've seen a couple link-local-addr-related bug reports. Not sure if
    those have been discussed yet.

    In general, there have been a bunch of IPv6 fixes recently, can you
    please test 2.6.10-rc3 (and/or 2.6.10-rc3-bk3)?

            Jeff

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  • Next message: Adam J. Richter: "[patch?] unpin sysfs directories, saving ~0.5MB"

    Relevant Pages