Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC PATCH] debugfs - yet another in-kernel file system
From: David Brownell (david-b_at_pacbell.net)
Date: 12/11/04
- Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: VM86 interrupt emulation breakage and FIXes for 2.6.x kernel series"
- In reply to: Greg KH: "[RFC PATCH] debugfs - yet another in-kernel file system"
- Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC PATCH] debugfs - yet another in-kernel file system"
- Reply: Greg KH: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC PATCH] debugfs - yet another in-kernel file system"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:29:01 -0800
On Thursday 09 December 2004 4:50 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> What if there was a in-kernel filesystem that was explicitly just for
> putting debugging stuff? Some place other than proc and sysfs, and that
> was easier than both of them to use. Yet it needed to also be able to
> handle complex stuff like seq file and raw file_ops if needed.
The problem with sysfs here is: no seq_file support.
Otherwise it solves the basic "where to put the debug
files associated with "device X" or "driver Y" problems
in a good non-confusing way: there are directories
already set up for devices and for drivers.
The problem with procfs here is that it doesn't have
such a naming solution: there's no automatic mapping
betwen a /proc/driver/...file and its device, or vice
versa. That issue is shared with debugfs.
Couldn't debugfs just be a thin shim on top of sysfs,
adding seq_file support? Or on top of procfs, adding
device/driver naming domains, and maybe file-per-value
read/write support for drivers that want them?
What I'd really want out of a debug file API is to resolve
the naming issues, work with seq_file, and "softly and
silently vanish away". I think this patch has the last
two, but not the first one!
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: VM86 interrupt emulation breakage and FIXes for 2.6.x kernel series"
- In reply to: Greg KH: "[RFC PATCH] debugfs - yet another in-kernel file system"
- Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC PATCH] debugfs - yet another in-kernel file system"
- Reply: Greg KH: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC PATCH] debugfs - yet another in-kernel file system"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|