Re: Anticipatory prefaulting in the page fault handler V2

From: Adam Litke (agl_at_us.ibm.com)
Date: 12/14/04

  • Next message: Antonio Vargas: "Re: arch/xen is a bad idea"
    To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
    Date:	Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:31:19 -0600
    
    

    Just to add another data point: This works on my 4-way ppc64 (Power4)
    box. I am seeing no degradation when running this on kernbench (which
    is expected). For the curious, here are the results:

    Kernbench results with anon-prefault:
    349.86user 49.64system 1:57.85elapsed 338%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    349.65user 49.81system 1:58.31elapsed 337%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    349.48user 50.00system 1:53.70elapsed 351%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    349.73user 49.69system 1:57.67elapsed 339%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    349.75user 49.85system 1:52.71elapsed 354%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    Elapsed: 116.048s User: 349.694s System: 49.798s CPU: 343.8%

    Kernbench results without anon-prefault:
    350.86user 52.54system 1:53.45elapsed 355%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    350.99user 52.36system 1:52.05elapsed 359%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    350.92user 52.68system 1:54.14elapsed 353%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    350.98user 52.38system 1:56.17elapsed 347%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    351.16user 52.31system 1:53.90elapsed 354%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
    Elapsed: 113.942s User: 350.982s System: 52.454s CPU: 353.6%

    On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 19:32, Christoph Lameter wrote:
    > Changes from V1 to V2:
    > - Eliminate duplicate code and reorganize things
    > - Use SetReferenced instead of mark_accessed (Hugh Dickins)
    > - Fix the problem of the preallocation order increasing out of bounds
    > (leading to memory being overwritten with pointers to struct page)
    > - Return VM_FAULT_OOM if not able to allocate a single page
    > - Tested on i386 and ia64
    > - New performance test for low cpu counts (up to 8 so that this does not
    > seem to be too exotic)

    -- 
    Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
    IBM Linux Technology Center
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    

  • Next message: Antonio Vargas: "Re: arch/xen is a bad idea"