Re: debugfs in the namespace
From: Greg KH (greg_at_kroah.com)
Date: 12/16/04
- Previous message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [RFC] Generalized prio_tree, revisited"
- In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: debugfs in the namespace"
- Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: debugfs in the namespace"
- Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: debugfs in the namespace"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:42:24 -0800 To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:33:57AM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:08:35 -0800, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:00:02AM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > > what is the canonic place to mount debugfs: /debug, /debugfs, or anything
> > > else? The reason I'm asking is that USBMon has to find it somewhere and
> > > I'd really hate to see it varying from distro to distro.
> >
> > Hm, in my testing I've been putting it in /dbg, but I don't like vowels :)
>
> Oh, that's right: usr and creat. How could I forget.
>
> > Anyway, I don't really know. /dev/debug/ ? /proc/debug ? /debug ?
> >
> > What do people want? I guess it's time to write up a LSB proposal :(
>
> I use /debug but it's not too late to change. Fedora does not ship it yet,
> so I don't think we have an institutional opinion about it.
>
> Personally, I'm against the doubles to prevent issues with the mounting
> order on boot, but that's rather weak. The /dev can be specially managed
> and I'm concerned with people running find(1) on it. The /proc sounds
> better, but mounting anything under /proc requires a kernel component
> to create a directory, does it not?
Yes it does, but debugfs could create the mount point, if people agree
that this is a good place to put it (like usbfs does.)
Personally, I don't want to put it there, but that's just because I hate
proc stuff :)
So, /debug sounds good to me. Any objections?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: [RFC] Generalized prio_tree, revisited"
- In reply to: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: debugfs in the namespace"
- Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: debugfs in the namespace"
- Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: debugfs in the namespace"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|