Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt (benh_at_kernel.crashing.org)
Date: 12/20/04
- Previous message: Nick Piggin: "Re: About kernel panic!"
- In reply to: Nick Piggin: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Next in thread: Nick Piggin: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:29:18 +0100
> Seems like that's where it belongs.
>
> The reason why it is in /sys/block is because it is apparently a "subsystem",
> and using decl_subsys - drivers/block/genhd.c
I'm not convinced ... If you look at how /sys is organized, it really
doesn't make any sense ... block devives are really devices of "class
block", wether we have a block "subsystem" in there is irrelevant imho.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Nick Piggin: "Re: About kernel panic!"
- In reply to: Nick Piggin: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Next in thread: Nick Piggin: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Reply: Nick Piggin: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
