Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block
From: Jan Engelhardt (jengelh_at_linux01.gwdg.de)
Date: 12/20/04
- Previous message: Einar Lück: "[PATCH 2/2] ipv4 routing: multipath with cache support, 2.6.10-rc3"
- In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:37:22 +0100 (MET) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Ditto, the question is how to move it with as little pain as possible...
>I think the symlink approach would be fine.
Wow.. I don't even have /sys/class/block (2.6.9-rc2)
Jan Engelhardt
-- ENOSPC - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Einar Lück: "[PATCH 2/2] ipv4 routing: multipath with cache support, 2.6.10-rc3"
- In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
