Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block
From: Jens Axboe (axboe_at_suse.de)
Date: 12/20/04
- Previous message: James Pearson: "Re: Reducing inode cache usage on 2.4?"
- In reply to: Jan Engelhardt: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:08:58 +0100 To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
(please follow list etiquette, don't trim cc lists)
On Mon, Dec 20 2004, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >Ditto, the question is how to move it with as little pain as possible...
> >I think the symlink approach would be fine.
>
> Wow.. I don't even have /sys/class/block (2.6.9-rc2)
That is Ben's point, it is currently misplaced.
-- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: James Pearson: "Re: Reducing inode cache usage on 2.4?"
- In reply to: Jan Engelhardt: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
