Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block
From: David Weinehall (tao_at_debian.org)
Date: 12/23/04
- Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "2.6.10-rc3-wli-1"
- In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Reply: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:39:38 +0100 To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 10:20:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
[snip]
> It is gross.
Indeed.
> But I guess I should ask, who really cares about this, so late in the
> sysfs structure game? Is /sys/block/ really a big problem for anyone?
> And if it is, I'd much rather someone make the required driver core
> changes to fix this up properly, than just put a symlink to paper over
> some userspace issue.
Maybe because *for once* it'd be nice to actually have inconsistencies
gotten rid of in their relative infancy instead of waiting 10 years
and then having to explain them as existing only for hysterical
raisins...
[snip]
Regards: David Weinehall
-- /) David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /) Northern lights wander (\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "2.6.10-rc3-wli-1"
- In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Next in thread: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Reply: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: /sys/block vs. /sys/class/block"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
