Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH
From: Paolo Ciarrocchi (paolo.ciarrocchi_at_gmail.com)
Date: 12/30/04
- Previous message: Dave Airlie: "[bk pull] drm core/personality split"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH"
- Next in thread: Con Kolivas: "Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH"
- Reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 08:36:42 +0100 To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:20:28 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew,
> > what's your plan for the staircase scheduler ?
>
> I have none, frankly. I haven't seen any complaints about the current
> scheduler.
>
> If someone can identify bad behaviour in the current scheduler which
> staircase improves then please describe a tescase which the scheduler
> developers can use to reproduce the situation.
>
> If, after that, we deem that the problem cannot be feasibly fixed within the
> context of the current scheduler and that the problem is sufficiently
> serious to justify wholesale replacement of the scheduler then sure,
> staircase is an option.
Your answer makes lot of sense.
I think Con can explain the pro and cons of the staircase scheduler.
Best,
-- Paolo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Dave Airlie: "[bk pull] drm core/personality split"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH"
- Next in thread: Con Kolivas: "Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH"
- Reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
