Re: [PATCH 1/2 2.6.10] rcu: simplify quiescent state detection
From: Oleg Nesterov (oleg_at_tv-sign.ru)
Date: 12/30/04
- Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "[Patch?] padlock-aes.c used forward inline function"
- In reply to: Manfred Spraul: "[PATCH 1/2 2.6.10] rcu: simplify quiescent state detection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:15:30 +0300 To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Manfred Spraul wrote:
>
> No, it's not needed. Actually: not even a counter is needed, just
> a flag that indicates that there was a quiescent state.
>
Yes, this patch is obviously better.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "[Patch?] padlock-aes.c used forward inline function"
- In reply to: Manfred Spraul: "[PATCH 1/2 2.6.10] rcu: simplify quiescent state detection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|