Re: Problems with 2.6.10
From: Fryderyk Mazurek (dedyk_at_go2.pl)
Date: 12/30/04
- Previous message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: [RFC 2.6.10 1/22] xfrm: Add direction information to xfrm_state"
- In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "Re: Problems with 2.6.10"
- Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Problems with 2.6.10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:45:46 +0100
Hello!
I'm sorry, but acpi=routeirq doesn't work. But to my head came other
thing. I noticed that I on 2.6.9 (which correct works) I have this
part of dmesg:
hdb: Host Protected Area detected.
current capacity is 66055248 sectors (33820 MB)
native capacity is 78165360 sectors (40020 MB)
hdb: 66055248 sectors (33820 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63,
UDMA(33)
and on 2.6.10 I have:
hdb: Host Protected Area detected.
current capacity is 66055248 sectors (33820 MB)
native capacity is 78165360 sectors (40020 MB)
hdb: Host Protected Area disabled.
hdb: 78165360 sectors (40020 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65535/16/63,
UDMA(33)
How see, first is 32GB (33820 MB), and second is 40GB (40020MB).
Correct value should be 32GB, in spite that my disk is 40GB. I want
to say, that I have a little old BIOS and my BIOS detect only 32GB,
therefore I have limited size of my disk. And maybe kernel 2.6.10
influence on my BIOS and force to detect 40GB, which is not
operable, because my BIOS is too old. I think that maybe to fix it I
should force my kernel to detect only 32GB, how on kernel 2.6.9.
Maybe this is a BUG of new kernel?
Fryderyk.
---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ----
Od: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Do: Fryderyk Mazurek <dedyk@go2.pl>
Kopia do: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Data: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:14:02 -0500
Temat: Re: Problems with 2.6.10
> Fryderyk Mazurek wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > My kernel 2.6.10 I compiled two times. First with ACPI and second
> > fully without ACPI. And the same situation.
> > For me this situation is strange, because usually reset should help,
> > but not this time. I thought that maybe my BIOS is too old. But with
> > 2.6.9 works. Therefore I don't know. Now I use 2.6.9.
> >
> > Fryderyk.
> >
> > ---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ----
> > Od: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> > Do: Fryderyk Mazurek <dedyk@go2.pl>
> > Kopia do: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Data: 27 Dec 2004 21:44:11 -0500
> > Temat: Re: Problems with 2.6.10
> >
> >
> >>On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 12:11, Fryderyk Mazurek wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>problem starts when I do reboot. On boot screen my bios can't
detect
> >>>my disk. Bios stops and nothing.
> >>
> >>Does reboot work if the initial boot is with acpi=off?
>
> With that system, perhaps acpi=ht would be better if he uses the
HT. And
> pci=routeirq may help as well, although it told me it was disabling
> IRQ18 and didn't!
>
> --
> bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
> CTO TMR Associates, Inc
> Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: [RFC 2.6.10 1/22] xfrm: Add direction information to xfrm_state"
- In reply to: Bill Davidsen: "Re: Problems with 2.6.10"
- Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Problems with 2.6.10"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
