Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine
From: Davide Libenzi (davidel_at_xmailserver.org)
Date: 12/31/04
- Previous message: Thomas Sailer: "Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine"
- In reply to: Jesse Allen: "Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine"
- Next in thread: Jesse Allen: "Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine"
- Reply: Jesse Allen: "Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine"
- Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 07:56:25 -0800 (PST) To: Jesse Allen <the3dfxdude@gmail.com>
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Jesse Allen wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > I don't think that the Wine problem resolution is due to the POPF
> > instruction handling. Basically Linus patch does a nice cleanup plus POPF
> > handling, so maybe the patch can be split.
>
> If you or Andi or anyone else wants to split up the patch and have me
> test it, I'd be willing. I could try it myself if you want, though it
> will be later, as I have to leave soon. But I really do think that it
> does have to do with POPF, since that alone seems to make wine happier
> all-round.
I don't think Linus ever posted a POPF-only patch. Try to comment those
lines in his POPF patch ...
if (is_at_popf(child, regs))
return;
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Thomas Sailer: "Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine"
- In reply to: Jesse Allen: "Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine"
- Next in thread: Jesse Allen: "Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine"
- Reply: Jesse Allen: "Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine"
- Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]