Re: 2.6.{9,10}: VIA DRM undefined symbols
From: Dave Airlie (airlied_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/03/05
- Previous message: Barry K. Nathan: "Re: 2.6.10: e100 network broken after swsusp/resume"
- In reply to: Mark Hindley: "2.6.{9,10}: VIA DRM undefined symbols"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:37:32 +1100 To: Mark Hindley <mark@hindley.uklinux.net>
>
> Looking back, this seems to have appeared in 2.6.9 with the introduction
> of the capabilities bitmask. The via driver appears not to have been
> converted.
>
> I am still trying to understand the new structure. What else does the
> missing viadrv_driver_register_fns need to set apart from
> dev->driver_features?
what via driver is this? where does it come from, the kernel doesn't
ship with via drivers yet... the DRM has been completely redesigned so
old modules won't work anymore...
Dave.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Barry K. Nathan: "Re: 2.6.10: e100 network broken after swsusp/resume"
- In reply to: Mark Hindley: "2.6.{9,10}: VIA DRM undefined symbols"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
