Re: [PATCH] fs: Restore files_lock and set_fs_root exports
From: Christoph Hellwig (hch_at_infradead.org)
Date: 01/07/05
- Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH][3/4] let's kill verify_area - convert kernel/compat.c to access_ok()"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] fs: Restore files_lock and set_fs_root exports"
- Next in thread: Mike Waychison: "Re: [PATCH] fs: Restore files_lock and set_fs_root exports"
- Reply: Mike Waychison: "Re: [PATCH] fs: Restore files_lock and set_fs_root exports"
- Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] fs: Restore files_lock and set_fs_root exports"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:26:24 +0000 To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:29:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Fine. Completely agree. Sometimes people do need to be forced to make
> such changes - I don't think anyone would disagree with that.
>
> What's under discussion here is "how to do it". Do we just remove things
> when we notice them, or do we give (say) 12 months notice?
Remove when we notice with a short (measured in weeks) period where that
removal happens only in -mm. It's a price people have to pay for not
submitting their code upstream.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH][3/4] let's kill verify_area - convert kernel/compat.c to access_ok()"
- In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] fs: Restore files_lock and set_fs_root exports"
- Next in thread: Mike Waychison: "Re: [PATCH] fs: Restore files_lock and set_fs_root exports"
- Reply: Mike Waychison: "Re: [PATCH] fs: Restore files_lock and set_fs_root exports"
- Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] fs: Restore files_lock and set_fs_root exports"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
