RE: [PATCH] /driver/net/wan/sbs520

From: Adam Anthony (AAnthony_at_sbs.com)
Date: 01/10/05

  • Next message: Jean Delvare: "Re: 2.6.10-mm2: it87 sensor driver stops CPU fan"
    To: Matthias-Christian Ott <matthias.christian@tiscali.de>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@mail.ru>
    Date:	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:49:23 -0700
    
    

    Thank you for the heads up A&M. I have destroyed the evil [^M]'s, and
    updated the package.
    http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/sbs520lnxdrv/sbs520patch.bz2?download
    -AA

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Matthias-Christian Ott [mailto:matthias.christian@tiscali.de]
    Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:26 PM
    To: Alexey Dobriyan
    Cc: Adam Anthony; netdev@oss.sgi.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    Subject: Re: [PATCH] /driver/net/wan/sbs520

    Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

    >On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:46:52 -0700, Adam Anthony wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >>With the permission of my employer, SBS Technologies, Inc., I have
    >>released a patch for 2.4 kernels that supports the 520 Series of WAN
    >>adapters.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >My editor shows ^M at the end of every line of new
    Documentation/Configure.help,
    >MAINTAINERS (add ~63400 bogus lines!). Please, look at the patch _after_
    >generating it.
    >
    >
    >
    >>+obj-$(CONFIG_LANMEDIA) += syncppp.o^M
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    >>+subdir-$(CONFIG_LANMEDIA) += lmc^M
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Also random ^M's.
    >
    >--- linux-2.4.28-virgin/drivers/net/wan/sbs520/lnxosl.c
    >+++ /usr/src/linux-2.4.28/drivers/net/wan/sbs520/lnxosl.c
    >
    >
    >
    >>+// Programming Language: C^M
    >>+// Target Processor: Any^M
    >>+// Target Operating System: Linux^M
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Well, this is pretty obvious to everyone here. :-)
    >
    >
    >
    >>+// This software may be used and distributed according to the terms^M
    >>+// of the GNU General Public License, incorporated herein by reference.^M
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Stupid question: do you mean GPL version 2 or something else?
    >
    > Alexey
    >-
    >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    >
    >
    >
    That's ugly, that are Microsoft line endings.

    Matthias-Christian Ott

    ***This message has been scanned for virus, spam, and undesirable
    content.***
    ***For further information, contact your mail administrator.***

    For limitations on the use and distribution of this message, please visit www.sbs.com/emaildisclaimer.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  • Next message: Jean Delvare: "Re: 2.6.10-mm2: it87 sensor driver stops CPU fan"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: permission() bug?
      ... > the fix for permission() that makes it compliant with POSIX.1-2001 ... Here is the patch I sent before. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: (v9fs) -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
      ... On 7/14/05, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: ... >> description fits. ... >> patch would have done it aswell, ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH] getrusage sucks
      ... I think this patch is too permissive. ... Should you be using the same permission check that ptracedoes? ... ptrace() is more restrictive than what you seemed to have in mind. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • [patch 1/2] selinux: add executable stack check
      ... This patch adds an execstack permission check that controls the ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • permission() bug?
      ... the fix for permissionthat makes it compliant with POSIX.1-2001 ... Here is the patch I sent before. ... Make permission check conform to POSIX.1-2001 ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)