Re: [patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: /proc/sys/kernel/rt_cpu_limit tunable
From: Chris Wright (chrisw_at_osdl.org)
Date: 01/25/05
- Previous message: Aurélien Jarno: "[PATCH 2.6] I2C: lm78 driver improvement"
- Maybe in reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: /proc/sys/kernel/rt_cpu_limit tunable"
- Next in thread: Bill Rugolsky Jr.: "Re: [patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: /proc/sys/kernel/rt_cpu_limit tunable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:16:30 -0800 To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote:
> But if someone reviewed all of the rlimit use in the kernel, we could
> make it a policy that rlimits might change. Any unsafe use could be made
> safe pretty easily. Since they are ulongs they are updated atomically
> even without any locking - but e.g. the default and the hard limit might
> change separately. (from the viewpoint of rlimit-using kernel code.)
I can wade through them later in the week.
> obviously a remote rlimit must listen to same kind of security
> permissions as e.g. ptrace or signal sending.
Yeah.
thanks,
-chris
-- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Aurélien Jarno: "[PATCH 2.6] I2C: lm78 driver improvement"
- Maybe in reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: /proc/sys/kernel/rt_cpu_limit tunable"
- Next in thread: Bill Rugolsky Jr.: "Re: [patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: /proc/sys/kernel/rt_cpu_limit tunable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
