Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage
From: Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol_at_2ka.mipt.ru)
Date: 01/26/05
- Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: RLIMIT_RT_CPU feature, -D7"
- In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Next in thread: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Reply: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:59:17 +0300
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 10:14 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:35:56AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > I have one rule - if noone answers that it means noone objects,
> > or it is not interesting for anyone, and thus noone objects.
>
> That's simply not true. The amount of patches submitted is extremly
> huge and the reviewers don't have time to look at everythning.
>
> If no one replies it simply means no one has looked at it in enough
> detail to comment yet.
That is why I resent it several times.
Then I asked for inclusion.
I never send it to lkml just because simple static/non static + module
name
discussion in lkml already overflowed into more than 20 messages...
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch, 2.6.11-rc2] sched: RLIMIT_RT_CPU feature, -D7"
- In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Next in thread: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Reply: Dmitry Torokhov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Reply: Adrian Bunk: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|