Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage
From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_stusta.de)
Date: 01/26/05
- Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] consolidate i386 NUMA init code"
- In reply to: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Next in thread: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Reply: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:19:41 +0100 To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 07:38:48PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>...
> Btw, where was comments about w1, kernel connector and acrypto?
> They were presented several times in lkml and all are completely new
> subsystems.
> Should I stop developing just because I did not get comments?
>...
I sent you comments regarding w1 two months ago regarding:
- the unneeded dscore -> ds9490r rename in the Makefile
- completely unused EXPORT_SYMBOL's (that seem to be still unused today)
Being honest, I have to admit that your reactions didn't sound as if you
were waiting for comments.
> Thank you.
>
> Evgeniy Polyakov
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] consolidate i386 NUMA init code"
- In reply to: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Next in thread: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Reply: Evgeniy Polyakov: "Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|