Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk_at_stusta.de)
Date: 01/26/05

  • Next message: Nguyen, Tom L: "RE: PCI Express MSI in kernel 2.4 ?"
    Date:	Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:06:02 +0100
    To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
    
    

    On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:59:17PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
    > On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 10:14 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:35:56AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
    > > > I have one rule - if noone answers that it means noone objects,
    > > > or it is not interesting for anyone, and thus noone objects.
    > >
    > > That's simply not true. The amount of patches submitted is extremly
    > > huge and the reviewers don't have time to look at everythning.
    > >
    > > If no one replies it simply means no one has looked at it in enough
    > > detail to comment yet.
    >
    > That is why I resent it several times.
    > Then I asked for inclusion.
    >
    > I never send it to lkml just because simple static/non static + module
    > name
    > discussion in lkml already overflowed into more than 20 messages...

    Your opinion on some things are different than the opinions of other
    people on some issues. That's normal.

    Then a discussion arises.
    That's normal and part of a review of some code.
    E.g. the "module name discussion" covered a real problem.

    Be it 1 email or be it 100 emails - the main point is simply that all
    code in the kernel should be as good as possible and as near as possible
    to kernel standards.

    The Linux kernel is a big project with _many_ people involved.
    I've also had people telling me that this or that I sent in a patch was
    nonsense. That's normal (and a criticism of your code is not meant as a
    personal insult) and leads to better code in the kernel.

    > Evgeniy Polyakov

    cu
    Adrian

    -- 
           "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
            of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
           "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                           Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    

  • Next message: Nguyen, Tom L: "RE: PCI Express MSI in kernel 2.4 ?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Bloat report 2.6.3 -> 2.6.4
      ... For the average computer you can buy at your supermarket today it isn't ... People who need to care about the size of the kernel use hand-tuned ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: ANNOUNCE: CE Linux Forum - Specification V1.0 draft
      ... Kernel SHALL be configuralble with compiler size options, ... "specification" didn't send a patch - the trivial patch was sent by ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Weirdness with suspending jobs in 2.6.9-rc3
      ... >> It doesn't depend on which version I'm compiling, ... >> kernel I'm actually running. ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH] OCFS2
      ... > It's a generic mechanism for userspace driven configuration of kernel ... > subsystems/projects could use it too, ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [2.6 patch] add a config option for -Os compilation
      ... kernel with some supported compilers) ... there might be fast path code somewhere in the kernel that becomes ... There had been need of rain for many days. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
      (Linux-Kernel)